I Can Prove the Age of the Universe and the Earth WITH FACTS!

Videofortheweeksign.jpg
Videofortheweeksign.jpg
   

Below are just 5 of hundreds of measurable FACTS that prove the age of the Earth being within the age given in the Word of God about 6000 years ago.
   
Facts are immutable. Interpretations are extrapolated and theories are developed. IF AT ANY TIME, the facts do not support a theory, then the theory is debunked and the facts remain.
      
The hard physical evidence supports only the Biblical world-view of creation. Evolutionists only have methods and theories to hang their religious model upon. If you look at ALL the evidence and information shown to us by God thru His creation, you will see the truth! God provides us proof of His existence all around us, we will not be able to hide behind our ignorance.
   
As it says in Romans 1:18-25,
“The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.
     
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.
   
Therefore God gave them over in the sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator—”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The oldest desert in the world is the Sahara Desert in Africa. Scientists from Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in 1999 concluded that the desertification process that produces deserts verifies the age of the Sahara Desert to be no more than 4000 years of age. 

This scientific conclusion brings about an interesting dilemma for old earth proponents. If the age of the earth is billions of years old, then why is the oldest desert in the world only 4000 years of age?  
    
The biblical world view is that the earth was deluged by a worldwide flood about 4400 years ago. The climate of the earth was very different before the Biblical flood. If the biblical view is correct and a flood did take place some 4400 years ago like ALL cultures of the past testify to, then the oldest desert in the world MUST be less than 4400 years old! 
   
Amazingly, it is!
…………………………………………………………………………………….. 
    
The human population growth chart provides proof that the earth is actually very young! The population of the world today has climbed over 6 billion people; in 1987 it was 5 billion; 1974 it had reached 4 billion; 1960 3 billion; 1930 2 billion; and the overwhelming consensus is that the population in 1800 had reached 1 billion people on the earth. They, also, agree that the world's population during Christ's day was only about 250 million people! That would be only a 1/4 billion souls on the earth around 30 A.D.  
The population growth chart is not disputed nor can the conclusions that come from that data. Today the population grows at a rate of about 2% per year. If you use a conservative growth rate of just .5% per year, then the total population reduces to ZERO in less than 5000 years! And, that is a conservative estimate! 
    
Here is the problem with the millions and billions of years' belief: If the present population is the result of millions of years of human history, then where are all of the bones to the several TRILLION people that once existed? If the population was sufficiently small until only recent history, then how could such a correspondingly infinitesimally small number of mutations have evolved the human race? 
    
Interesting dilemma, isn’t it? 
……………………………………………………………………………………..  
     
Earth's magnetic field is fading. Scientists have known this for some time. Like all magnets, the earth is losing its electromagnetism. Its strength has steadily and mysteriously slowed, leaving parts of the planet vulnerable to increased radiation from space. Over the last 150 years, since monitoring began, scientists have measured a 10% decrease in the Earth's magnetic field. The field would therefore lose half its energy or strength in less than 1500 years! Such a fast rate is astonishing considering the size of the magnetic field. Nevertheless, the rapid decline remained relatively unknown to the public, known only to researchers and students of geomagnetism until recently. 
This empirical data is evidence that the magnetic field COULD NOT be more than a 25,000 years old! Following the timeline backwards into the past, the Earth’s magnetic field would have been unreasonably strong in as little as 10,000 years. 
    
Another by-product of this fact is that carbon dating CANNOT work for more than 3000 years or so. One of the assumptions made for the carbon dating method to work is that the Carbon-14 in the atmosphere must have reached a state of equilibrium. They state that it would take only 30,000 years for equilibrium to be reached. So, since the evolutionists believe in the old earth (billions of years model), they, therefore, bypassed this assumption. 
    
Of course, they are now finding out that the Carbon-14 still has not reached an equilibrium point.  Isn’t that interesting? 
    
If the Carbon-14 in the atmosphere is still changing, then the age of the Earth MUST be less than 30,000 years old. The reason that carbon dating methods do not work is that as the magnetic field declines, more radiation gets thru the atmosphere producing more Carbon-14 causing a “rubber ruler” effect making ages measured extremely bloated. 
   
The supporters of an old earth belief have tried to put a band aid on this evidence by coming up with the theory of pole reversals whereby the magnetic field will “simply” reverse itself after millions of years and suddenly reinvigorate a “new” magnetic field once again. Mind you, it will simply do it by itself….! 
…………………………………………………………………………………….. 
    
The moon is further distancing itself from the Earth. It is constantly being gravitationally attracted forward in its orbit about the Earth. This pull is producing the drag on the Earth’s rotation as well slowing it down. The moon is being continually forced into a more distant orbit from the Earth. The distance of the moon from the Earth is increased by about 3.82 cm per year. 
   
So let’s look at this in more simple terms; 
The moon revolves around the Earth and its orbit is growing in size at a slow rate of a couple of inches per year. If the Earth and moon’s age are measured in thousands of years, then its effect upon the Earth would be miniscule.  However, if we are talking millions or even billions of years in age, then it becomes a serious issue of which scientists ALL agree.
    
One of the major problems is the effect of the moon upon the tides of the Earth. By using the Inverse-Square Law, if the moon is about 1/3 closer to the Earth, then its gravitational pull upon the tides would be 9 TIMES GREATER!  If you go back millions or even billions of years, the tides would have been so great that it would have engulfed the Earth twice a day. Kind of hard to have dinosaurs and other creatures living on the Earth during those times, wouldn’t you agree as well? Just going back only one million years, the gravitational force would have been too great for any life to have existed.
    
What does that mean? 
    
The EARTH cannot be old! Evolutionists have tried to deflect this problem to no avail, however. They speculated that the moon broke off from the Earth’s crust; however this hypothesis has been debunked due to the fact that the moon would have to orbit following the equatorial plane, but it doesn’t! Its orbit is on an ecliptic plane. So, it cannot be from the Earth! They then abandoned that hypothesis for another. The only other alternative left for Evolutionists is that the moon must have been captured by the Earth’s gravity. But, upon further investigation, they have found that this explanation cannot be as well.
   
The conditions necessary for such a mechanism to work, such as extended atmosphere to dissipate the energy brought about from the captured moon are NOT POSSIBLE! 
   
So what are we left with? 
   
The moon and the Earth could not have existed more than a few thousand YEARS! 
   
SIDE NOTE: 
      
NASA was so afraid to send men to the moon for the fear of losing them from sinking into the miles of dust that should exist on the surface of the moon. Their belief was based on the evolutionary model that the Earth and moon were billions of years old. With the meteoric bombardment and the breakup of surface rocks, they surmised that the moon’s surface would be covered by miles of dust. So, they sent unmanned probes to confirm their fear. However, their fear was dissipated for they found out that the moon’s surface was only covered by about 2-3 inches of dust which indicated an age of ONLY 6-8 thousand years! This finding is silenced among the scientific community by the evolutionists; of course! 
   
…………………………………………………………………………………….. 
    
The Earth is slowing down. There has been a steady deceleration of the Earth on its axis. Like a flywheel without a motor, it is slowing down by approximately one second every year to year and a half. This is a fact! About once a year, a leap second has to be introduced into the (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time, the world’s atomic time scale for civil time, in order to keep it in phase with the rotation of the Earth. The fluctuations in the deceleration are believed to be the result of the recession of the moon from the Earth.  
In just the past 2000 years, the Earth has slowed by over 30 minutes!
    
Although the increase in the length of day seems miniscule, it does present a major problem to the old-earth proponents. If you go back by thousands of years like the Bible states, then the days would be a little faster, yet still inhabitable and not really noticed.  However, if you speak of the Earth being millions and billions of years old; that is NOT possible!
The Earth would be spinning too fast! The centrifugal force would have produced a correolus effect upon the winds that would have produced winds in access of thousands of miles per hour. That condition obviously did not exist which leads us to ONLY one conclusion! The age of the Earth CANNOT be measured in millions and billions of years! The Earth must be much, much younger.   
   
The videos provided shows more evidence of the facts that prove the age of the Universe and the Earth to be within the time of the Biblical account. Check it out as well!